Understand
Your Style For Effective Leadership
By Glenn
Gutek
At the risk of placing
substance over style, all leaders must understand this simple truth:
style does matter. It is not about matching your belt to your
shoes, or accessorizing appropriately for the occasion, but rather
understanding the way you go about leading.
Allen rose through the
ranks of the military with great ease and retired young with a high
rank. Properly prepared for his transition into civilian life,
Allen was able to land a great opportunity with an upstart tech firm
in the mid-west. Everyone was confident his previous leadership
performance would translate to the battlefield of competitive
software development. Within months it became obvious that the
members of Allen’s team were not responsive to the command and
control leadership style that Allen was comfortable exercising.
Allen’s story is not
uncommon. Effective leadership in one field or with one team does
not always translate to effective leadership with another team or
another field. The complexity of the marketplace has prompted the
importance of knowing your leadership style and discerning the style
that a team will easily respond to. The distinctions of leadership
styles could be endless; however, the following six styles are the
most prominent in the workforce today.
Charismatic:
This is leadership by infusion of energy often embodied in the
personality of the leader. This leadership style may encompass a
wide swath of personalities, but the common ingredient is that the
energy ushered in by the leader is closely connected to the leader
herself or himself. Once Elvis leaves the building, so does some of
that infectious energy!
Over the years, this style
has been both praised and panned, but any study of leadership must
recognize that there is value to those who bring energy to an
organization by their sheer presence. The downside of this
leadership is the reality that some teams don’t need to speed things
up, but rather slow things down. The charismatic leader is an
excellent vision-caster and can elicit a loyal and passionate
following. Where this style will often fall short is in the
attention to details.
Technician:
This is leadership by displaying both knowledge and skill. This
style is highly valued in cultures where competence is high in
economic value. It is leading by simply being the best producer of
what your organization produces. This leadership style can
influence their arena with an impeccable reputation, and sets the
bar for the standard of work quality.
There are limits this
style has in being replicated throughout an organization. Some
leaders who strongly employ this style can in time be a little like
the “Wizard of Oz,” hiding behind the curtain, pulling strings,
leaving everyone to wonder “how does he/she do it?” Nobody can
argue with the value quality plays in any arena. Keep in mind there
is a distinction between leading the best, and being the best.
Strategic: This is leadership
by connecting the dots. This style is embodied in people who tend to
be global and conceptual thinkers. They not only are able to see the
end destination, but they know the path to get there must be
identified and paved. Tragically, this style can be marred by the
blues, because not only do strategic leaders see what could be, they
see what is not.
Team Builder:
Here, leadership is by roles and unity. This style recognizes that
you can’t just assemble any group of people and claim you have a
team. This leadership style is employed by people who look at people
individually and find individual roles for them to fill. At the
same time, they align these individuals into a cohesive whole.
Managerial: This is leadership
by systems. This style focuses on doing things right. Processes and
systems are designed and understood so that current operations
function consistently. Though some would argue that managers are not
leaders, you have to acknowledge that effective managers have a
profound influence on those that surround them. In fact, they have
the capacity to lead a culture that prizes management, even at the
expense of effectiveness.
Directive:
Here we have leadership by control. This style was once enamored
with the industrial revolution. In recent years, it has been stated
that command and control are no longer cherished. However, any
organization in crisis would love to have a directive leader step
forward and bring order out of chaos. There is still a need for
directive leaders.
Employing Your Understanding of Leadership Styles:
The most important
thing to be understood when examining the concept of leadership
styles is to recognize that there are circumstances where certain
styles flourish and others where they flounder. In days of old, the
common philosophy was to master all of these styles. “A man for all
seasons” was the fantasy of owners, entrepreneurs, and executives.
Today, the world is way
too diverse and complex; and truthfully, nobody was ever excellent
at all styles. Most writers on the subject these days encourage you
to know your style and function in an environment where your style
will flourish. As a leader, not only should you know your natural
style, but you should also know the “shadow side” of that style: How
does your winning formula undermine your effectiveness?
Typically, a leader’s
ineffectiveness will not be exposed, even if one of their weaknesses
is revealed. Ineffectiveness will shine when your strength runs
amuck. There is an old saying that if the only tool you have is a
hammer, than the whole world looks like a nail. Some of the biggest
mistakes in leadership are when you are using a hammer when sand
paper is required.
Effective leadership in
today’s diverse culture will require a team approach, and teams
require diverse leadership styles.
By not only employing the best leadership style for you, but also
knowing when to adapt to other styles, you can effectively lead your
team to success.
Read other articles and learn more about
Glenn Gutek.
[This article is available at no-cost, on a non-exclusive basis.
Contact PR/PR at 407-299-6128 for details.]
|